Best Buy refuses to sell Assassin’s Creed to adult when a minor is present

assasscreed.jpg

While checking my favorite non-gaming blog, the Consumerist, I stumbled across an interesting Best Buy customer experience. Over the weekend, a 21 year-old walked into the Best Buy in Orland Park, IL with his 15 year-old brother in hopes of purchasing Assassin’s Creed and an Xbox Live Gold Membership with $100 in Best Buy gift cards.

While the two were at the cash register, the older brother asked for his gift cards that his younger brother was holding. Somewhere during the process, the cashier refused to sell the game to the older brother since she was under the assumption that the older brother was purchasing the game for the 15 year-old.

After the cashier refused to sell the game to the two brothers, the story takes a complicated turn for the worst. In an attempt to better understand the situation, I have included the brother’s first-hand account of the entire ordeal. I also had a chance to speak with a Best Buy employee regarding the various store policies in question.

Thanks for sticking around! Here is the older brother’s version of the story:

I stepped up to the red haired, slightly obese cashier and she immediately gave me a look of disgrace as if I did something wrong. I replied with a “hi” to make the tension less awkward. She immediately asked me for my ID. I’ve never been carded for a video game before so I politely handed it to her while asking my brother for my gift cards I gave him while I was busy shuffling through my car just 20 minutes earlier.
She then left the the register booth with my ID and video game and went to her manager. The Best Buy cashier then came back and shouted that I’m purchasing a video game for a minor in front of everyone in line behind me and her fellow cashiers. She even had the nerve to ask, “Is that even your brother with you?!” Hell yes he is! I was embarrassed! It’s like she was condemning me for purchasing alcohol for a minor.

I quickly responded back that I am 21 year old and that the video game and peripheral are for me. She shook her head with a menacing grim and said that she saw me take gift cards from my brother and that what I am doing is illegal. Enough of this obese 17 year olds shenanigans! I demanded a manager. Unfortunately the manager was probably about 18 years old as well.

In front of the store again he told me that I am illegally purchasing a video game for a minor. I responded back that they are my gift cards! I want to make a purchase. That’s when he picked up Xbox Live GOLD. I then asked if I couldn’t buy that either. He then took a few minutes to scrutinize the box looking for an online peripherals rating. He never found it and said to me, he’s not sure, I might not be able to do that either (Xbox Live was also rated E for everyone mind you). I continued to repeat that these are my gift cards, I’m 21 and I want to make my purchase. The cashier and manager continued to condemn me in front of all that I’m illegally purchasing the game for a minor.

I brought up two ultimatums. “So I have to go drive miles outside Orland Park, IL to another Best Buy to purchase the video game then?” The manager shrugged and said, “I guess so.”

I also brought up the option then that if I left the store with my brother, came back in by myself and made the purchase, would that be legal then? The manager replied, “Technically, yes, that will be OK.”

I then told them to hold on to the Xbox Live Gold since it was the last one left. I left the store with my brother, told him to go to the car. I then walked back into the store. The manager earlier told me that I can’t use the old video game I originally had in hand because it was deemed under “penalty.” I then had to walk all the way to the back of the cavernous store, pick up the video game then walk back to the line I was originally in. I stood in line for another 10 minutes waiting. I finally got back up to the obese red head cashier where she smirked and looked at me and said, “Yeah, we can’t sell you that video game.” What?! “Those gift cards are illegal.”

How the hell does she know someone didn’t just give me the gift cards on the street or if I had more of my “OWN” gift cards from the car. They just told me that I was able to purchase the video game once I walked my brother out.

Just a few moments ago, I had a chance to speak with a Best Buy employee, who coincidentally enough, just happens to work for the Best Buy in question.

Even if there is a younger kid next to the purchaser, we wouldn’t just assume that the product was for them [the minor]. The only reason why a situation like this would be initiated is if in fact the younger brother came up by himself to buy the game and was denied. Then we are not allowed to sell the game to the older brother that came in to buy the product because he is not the legal guardian. The cashier only did her job. Best Buy has a strong stance with the ESRB in which we do not sell to somebody younger than 17 unless they are accompanied by a legal guardian.

I tend to side against the store in these types of cases, but in this situation, I am having a hard time believing that every detail in the brother’s account is 100% accurate.

The brother’s side of the story sounds like something that he fired off to the Consumerist a few hours after the entire situation occured, and his anger is echoed throughout the complaint. When somebody writes a quick email out of anger, it’s easy to leave out a few details. My best guess is that the cashier tossed up a red flag when the older brother asked his younger brother for the gift cards. If that is true, then the cashier was just doing her job by refusing to sell the game at the time.

The brother mentions that the cashier and manager claimed that buying games for a minor is illegal. This is false, as there are no laws in Illinois that prohibit a minor from purchasing a Mature rated game. However, most retailers have a strict policy set forth to enforce the ESRB ratings.

Does this explain the shabby treatment that the brother claims he received from the cashier? No, but I have an extremely hard time believing that a guy who describes a person as a “red haired, slightly obese cashier” as a completely innocent person who handled the conflict in a calm manner.

The Consumerist

Digg Facebook Google Buzz MySpace StumbleUpon E-mail Del.icio.us Reddit Technorati Yahoo Buzz AddThis
  • Michael
    This kind of thing happens all the time.. Sometimes it gets blown out of proportion, that's all.
  • matthew
    No worries Billie. It's just that when the term rep is tossed around, we are referring to an official spokesperson for a particular company, so I just wanted to make sure we are on the same page.

    And you bring up a good point for how the terms are used. I would try to discuss this further, but it is illegal for me to do so, and therefore, you are breaking the law!

    Yeah, I see your point.
  • Billie
    My bad for using the word "rep", I understood that your contact was somebody you knew that worked at Best Buy for an extended period of time, as do I, and probably many other viewers of this site. I ment "rep" as a slang term kinda like "buddie" or "homie". I also totally agree with you regarding his choice of descriptions used while telling us his story. They were inappriopriate and really destroyed his testomony.

    While saying it's "illegal" or "against store policy" ultimately lead to the same outcome, there is a different attitude for saying one or the other, and differnent emotions that come into play. For example...

    "Sorry Sir, it's against store policy, I cannot sell this to you".
    What I hear - Sorry sir, I can't sell you this because the manager will fire me.

    "Sorry Sir, it's illegal, and I cannot sell this to you."
    What I hear - Sorry sir, you are trying to break the law.

    But in all honesty, I'm not trying to be a hater at all, just stating my opinion, I hope nobody took it the wrong way =)
  • matthew
    @ Everybody:

    It wasn't my intention to make it sound like the guy's story is completely false.

    My stance is just that it really doesn't matter if the best buy employees said it was "illegal" or if they said it was against store policy. No matter which term was used, it is the EXACT same situation of a store not allowing the guy to purchase the game, regardless of what terms people want to throw around for their reasoning.

    I absolutely agree that it is ridiculous for retail employees pretend to hold authority and invent their own little reasoning to back up store policy/suggestions, such as saying things are "illegal."

    The point I was trying to make is that I had a hard time siding a person who is obviously angry and uses insults and derogatory comments towards employees throughout his story. A person who doesn't present themselves in a calm manner throughout a situation instantly loses most of their credibility. Anger causes people to exaggerate certain parts of their story when they tell it to somebody else. Trust me, I know.

    And to Billie's comment of "we cannot determine that his comments are false based on what “our” Best Buy reps tell us."

    You misinterpreted what I was trying to get across. I only added my contact's (NOT a rep in any way, but just a person who has worked at Best Buy for several years. He is in no way an official anything.) statements for people to understand what the actual Best Buy store policy is if they were unsure. It was not meant to make the guy's story false.
  • stickboy79
    There is a chance that the associate did say "illegal" as opposed to store policy. At the Walmart I'm working at, I've heard people who work in the electronics make this mistake (I've even been guilty of it, shamefully). What's sad is they make us take CBL's (computer based learning), but since nothing is really elaborated I'm assuming they were like me and thought that since M rated games and R rated movies are treated like Tobacco and Alcohol that illegal comes to mind first. Sadly not everyone is adept in Illinois law when it comes to these types of things.

    Sad thing is I've even heard the managers where I work make this same type of mistake before...so it's not entirely unfeasable, however since it is coming from an angry kid's point of view, it's really all up in the air to me.
  • I totally side with Best Buy. It was totally appropriate to accuse this gentleman in front of other customers. It was also appropriate for the manager to tell him that if he returned without his little brother that he would be able to purchase the game. It was even MORE appropriate for them to deny him his purchase when he returned without his little brother.

    I work in sales, I've had a large number of customer service jobs. I was even a manager at my local GameCrazy. What the associates at this Best Buy did was shitty. Plain and simple.
  • drktrpr1
    Having worked at a chain store (Lord and Taylor) for a few months, I can definitely say that a) there are differences between stores when it comes to policies like that, and that b) there are differences between what the higher-ups tell us to do and what actually gets done.
  • Billie
    While we will never know exactly what happened (It's a one sided argument), we cannot determine that his comments are false based on what "our" Best Buy reps tell us. Even though Best Buy "SHOULD" never do that, it doesn't necessarily mean that every chain in the world isn't going to have a manager or employee that is going to "invent" their own rules just to be dicks to a dicky customer....I have a similar example (without making a fuss).....

    I went to Wal-Mart with my girlfriend and we both got carded for buying a R rated movie (we are both 26 - I guess we still look 12), I asked why, if I was buying why would she have to show her id? The lady at the register said it was "illegal" if she didn't. Of course there is nothing illegal at all, it is only store policy. We of course didn't make a big deal, but it is annoying that this clerk used "the law" to get us to show our credentials, rather than stating that it is store policy.
  • matthew
    I agree with you Billie, but I also have my doubts that the store said "that's illegal" as many times as the writer claims. They could have said "it's against store policy" and the writer would still be as mad as he was.

    Also, I asked my Best Buy contact about the part of the story where the writer says:

    "The manager earlier told me that I can’t use the old video game I originally had in hand because it was deemed under 'penalty.'"

    He told me that Best Buy never, ever does that. And he's worked there for around three years.

    But please, somebody correct me if I'm wrong about anything.
  • Billie
    Well the problem with this situation is that the Best Buy employee stated that it was "illegal", when in fact there is no law preventing the sale of a "Mature" rated game to a minor. It is only store policy of various outlets (Wal-Mart, Best Buy, etc). While the buyer could have handled the situation wrong (It seems like he was being a dick), it is also wrong for the Best Buy employee to "Bully" the customer buy lying about the actual legallity of the actual purchase.
  • Hax0rz
    Yeah I definatly support the store on this one.
  • Haha! I go to that Best Buy.
blog comments powered by Disqus