<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nintendo scores the first 0/10 in environmental performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/</link>
	<description>Your one-stop source for Video Game news coverage!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tanooki &#187; Nintendo improves Greenpeace score to 0.3</title>
		<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-15485</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tanooki &#187; Nintendo improves Greenpeace score to 0.3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/#comment-15485</guid>
		<description>[...] when Nintendo scored a 0/10 in environmental performance? It was mostly because their information isn&#8217;t public. Since then, Greenpeace has gotten [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when Nintendo scored a 0/10 in environmental performance? It was mostly because their information isn&#8217;t public. Since then, Greenpeace has gotten [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tanooki &#187; The race for a green console: "I'ma gonna win...suckers!"</title>
		<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-12974</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tanooki &#187; The race for a green console: "I'ma gonna win...suckers!"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/#comment-12974</guid>
		<description>[...] isn&#8217;t the only company harming the environment, says Greenpeace. All three console makers are doing so, and Greenpeace has created the site below [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] isn&#8217;t the only company harming the environment, says Greenpeace. All three console makers are doing so, and Greenpeace has created the site below [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tanooki &#187; Nintendo surprised by Greenpeace report; says they're trying</title>
		<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-12970</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tanooki &#187; Nintendo surprised by Greenpeace report; says they're trying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/#comment-12970</guid>
		<description>[...] you queried Nintendo about their 0/10 score from Greenpeace, you&#8217;ll get a lovely PR response. They even have a website to go along with it! &#8220;We [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you queried Nintendo about their 0/10 score from Greenpeace, you&#8217;ll get a lovely PR response. They even have a website to go along with it! &#8220;We [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-9975</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/#comment-9975</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget their plans of world domination. Greenpeace don&#039;t like that.

I&#039;m pretty confused that Nintendo didn&#039;t at least get points for effort based purely on the fact that their console uses a fraction of the amount of energy needed to run than MSoft and Sony&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget their plans of world domination. Greenpeace don&#8217;t like that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty confused that Nintendo didn&#8217;t at least get points for effort based purely on the fact that their console uses a fraction of the amount of energy needed to run than MSoft and Sony&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-9960</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/#comment-9960</guid>
		<description>Not only is Nintendo solely responsible for the hole in the ozone layer, but they also make the Wii using ground up baby seals and elephant tusks. That is why they got the zero score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is Nintendo solely responsible for the hole in the ozone layer, but they also make the Wii using ground up baby seals and elephant tusks. That is why they got the zero score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-9955</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/#comment-9955</guid>
		<description>Well this certainly doesn&#039;t match up with one of our previous stories:

http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/06/24/a-convenient-truth-nintendo-dedicated-to-being-green/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this certainly doesn&#8217;t match up with one of our previous stories:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/06/24/a-convenient-truth-nintendo-dedicated-to-being-green/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/06/24/a-convenient-truth-nintendo-dedicated-to-being-green/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billie</title>
		<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-9952</link>
		<dc:creator>Billie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/#comment-9952</guid>
		<description>Yep it&#039;s true, Nintendo got docked scores because they didn&#039;t provide this information on their website.  Nintendo should have gotten a N/A instead of a zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep it&#8217;s true, Nintendo got docked scores because they didn&#8217;t provide this information on their website.  Nintendo should have gotten a N/A instead of a zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ApolloBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-9950</link>
		<dc:creator>ApolloBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/12/01/nintendo-scores-the-first-010-in-environmental-performance/#comment-9950</guid>
		<description>In Nintendo&#039;s defense, I would just like to point out that upon closer inspection you&#039;ll realise that Greenpeace gave zeroes in categories where information was unavailable. If Nintendo did not or could not provide information then they were given a zero which seems pretty stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Nintendo&#8217;s defense, I would just like to point out that upon closer inspection you&#8217;ll realise that Greenpeace gave zeroes in categories where information was unavailable. If Nintendo did not or could not provide information then they were given a zero which seems pretty stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

