<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harrison: No DS 3.0 anytime soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/11/21/harrison-no-ds-30-anytime-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/11/21/harrison-no-ds-30-anytime-soon/</link>
	<description>Your one-stop source for Video Game news coverage!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Hax0rz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/11/21/harrison-no-ds-30-anytime-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-9671</link>
		<dc:creator>Hax0rz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/11/21/harrison-no-ds-30-anytime-soon/#comment-9671</guid>
		<description>I think the Lite is fine as it is and they should only focus on it&#039;s successor in terms of the &quot;DS 2&quot; not a redesign of the current system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Lite is fine as it is and they should only focus on it&#8217;s successor in terms of the &#8220;DS 2&#8243; not a redesign of the current system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/11/21/harrison-no-ds-30-anytime-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-9668</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/11/21/harrison-no-ds-30-anytime-soon/#comment-9668</guid>
		<description>People might get frustrated if they have to buy the newest DS all the time. Although it probably wouldn&#039;t be a big deal if the rumours are spot on, people could still feel satisfied with their DS lites&#039; backwards compatibility.

Personally, I hope this doesn&#039;t come anytime soon. I need the money for games, not new hardware..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People might get frustrated if they have to buy the newest DS all the time. Although it probably wouldn&#8217;t be a big deal if the rumours are spot on, people could still feel satisfied with their DS lites&#8217; backwards compatibility.</p>
<p>Personally, I hope this doesn&#8217;t come anytime soon. I need the money for games, not new hardware..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billie</title>
		<link>http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/11/21/harrison-no-ds-30-anytime-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-9650</link>
		<dc:creator>Billie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/11/21/harrison-no-ds-30-anytime-soon/#comment-9650</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it obvious?  I mean once Nintendo says that it has a new version of the DS, people will stop buying the old one and wait for the new one.  But then again is that a bad thing?  Apple does it all the time with its ipods, iMacs, and Macbooks all the time with excellent results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it obvious?  I mean once Nintendo says that it has a new version of the DS, people will stop buying the old one and wait for the new one.  But then again is that a bad thing?  Apple does it all the time with its ipods, iMacs, and Macbooks all the time with excellent results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

